At James H. Wilson Law Firm, we understand that the process of divorce can be complex and emotionally taxing. With this FAQ page, we aim to provide clarity on the key differences between no fault and fault divorces to better inform your decisions throughout this challenging time. Should you need personalized legal assistance, remember that our team is just a phone call away at 804.740.6464.
In a “no fault” divorce, the spouse requesting the dissolution of marriage is not required to prove any wrongdoing by their partner. This more straightforward method of separation is permissible in all states. Essentially, one party needs only to cite a recognized reason such as “irreconcilable differences,” “incompatibility,” or an “irremediable breakdown of the marriage.” Some jurisdictions may require the couple to live apart for a predetermined period before granting a no fault divorce.
Unlike the no fault option, fault divorce is contingent on one spouse proving that the other has engaged in misconduct that justifies the termination of the marriage. Not all states accept fault as grounds for divorce, but where it is an option, recognized justifications may include cruelty, adultery, desertion, imprisonment, or undisclosed impotence at the time of marriage.
Opting for a fault divorce may shorten the waiting period for separation mandated in some states. Furthermore, establishing the other party’s fault might influence the distribution of marital property or affect alimony arrangements.
When both spouses have grounds for fault, the court may apply the doctrine of “comparative rectitude,” awarding the divorce to the party deemed less at fault. Historically, mutual fault could deny either party a divorce, but this outdated practice has since been replaced by more equitable solutions.
A no fault divorce cannot be stopped by the objection of a spouse, as such an objection itself exemplifies an irreconcilable difference. On the other hand, in a fault divorce, one may avert the proceedings by disproving the allegations of fault. Additional defenses, albeit seldom employed due to their complexity and cost, could include condonation, connivance, provocation, and collusion.
States typically require a residency duration, ranging from six months to one year, before an individual can file for divorce. The requirement aims to prevent non-residents from seeking favorable divorce laws in states where they do not live. Residency is not required in Alaska, South Dakota, and Washington—filing while residing there is sufficient. To avoid added expenses and inconvenience, it is often advisable to file for divorce in your home state.
A divorce granted in a state where one spouse is a resident is generally valid across the board. However, a court’s decisions on property, alimony, custody, and child support are only enforceable if the court had jurisdiction over the nonresident spouse. Jurisdiction is secured either through personal service of divorce paperwork or the nonresident spouse’s consent to the jurisdiction. It’s crucial to consult with an attorney when dealing with international divorce proceedings to navigate the specific variables at play.
If you’re considering divorce and seeking detailed guidance tailored to your situation, please reach out to the dedicated team at James H. Wilson Law Firm. Contact us at 804.740.6464 to discuss your legal options and secure the representation you deserve.